Please review details carefully!! This is final project and needs to be perfect with no mistakes. Answer every question in detail listed below, meets the rubric requirements and it is imperative citations are correct. Thank you
Option #2: Medicaid Managed Care Essay
Review the Kohatsu, Payne, and Subramania article, The Few Winner from Medicaids Shift to Managed Care (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Using data provided by the Kaiser Family Foundation Medicaid Managed Care Market Tracker (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., please identify three states that have not transitioned their Medicaid programs to the managed care model and three states that have shifted their Medicaid program to managed care.
Then complete the following for your essay:
Research the three states that have not shifted their Medicaid programs to the managed care model and discuss the reasons why each of these states has not transitioned. Explain if you agree or disagree with the rational of each states decision.
Research the three states that have shifted their Medicaid programs to the managed care model and discuss their successes and challenges.
Should the CMS mandate Medicaid managed care programs for every state? What are some of the pros and cons and arguments from the perspectives of states, the CMS, and the Medicaid beneficiaries?
Your assignment should meet the following requirements:
Be 10 to 12 pages.
Include a title page and reference page, for a total of 12-14 pages.
Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Cite at least four credible sources, published within the last five years, in addition to the course textbook. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.
Rubric Requirement
HCM400 Mod 8 PP
HCM400 Mod 8 PP
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of managed care as outlined in the option selection; correctly represents knowledge from the interview (if applicable), readings, and sources.
32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis 1
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of either the interviewees responses to questions regarding industry regulations, or of the research that explains why the three identified states *have not* shifted their Medicaid programs.
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis.
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in critical analysis.
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate critical analysis.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis 2
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of either the interviewees responses to questions regarding industry challenges and the organizations attitude toward managed care, or of the research that explains the successes and challenges of the three identified states that *have* switched to Medicaid.
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis.
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in critical analysis.
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate critical analysis.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis and Evaluation
60.0 to >48.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of either the interviewees response to the ACA and the future of the healthcare industry, including organizational governance; or of the future of Medicaid managed care programs and the pros and cons regarding implementing it nationally.
48.0 to >36.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
36.0 to >24.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
24.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates at least 4 current, scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cites and integrates 3 current, scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cites and integrates 2 current, scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Cites and integrates 1 current, scholarly source in addition to the textbook.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Source Material
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar and Style
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the *CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements*, with no more than one significant error.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the *CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements*, with no more than two to three significant errors.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the *CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements*, with four to five significant errors.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the *CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements*, with more than five significant errors.
20.0 pts
Total Points: 300.0
